Overview of Corporations versus LLC's
The LLC has also eclipsed the corporation as the preferred business entity
in most circumstances. Though the corporate structure remains useful for
larger companies, it has drawbacks over the LLC for the smaller venture.
— Statutory inflexibility. Corporate laws are comprehensive and less flexible
than LLC laws. Corporate by-laws rigidly define how a corporation will
operate. In contrast, LLC operating agreements may allow LLC members to
structure their company to best suit their specific needs. Corporate laws
favor large companies. Small and medium companies may find the corporate
statutory inflexibility a hindrance to shaping their enterprise.
— More cumbersome operational requirements. Corporate decision-making
must adhere to complex procedural formalities that are often too cumbersome
for small and medium-sized businesses. Certain corporate decisions require
stockholder votes. Important decisions must be through formal corporate
board meetings. Failure to observe these formalities may allow creditors
to pierce the corporate veil and directors and/or shareholders can then
be personally responsible for company debts. LLC managers have broad leeway
to make decisions without formality — except in those few instances
defined in the LLC's operating agreement. LLCs may also be structured
to give the members as little or as much control over operational decisions
as is desired.
— Limited choice of tax classification. A corporation may choose to be
taxed only one of two ways: The Internal Revenue Code refers to them as
C corporations and S corporations. The C corporation may be undesirable
because the corporation pays a tax on its profits and its stockholders
are taxed when they receive a distribution of profit (a stock dividend).
To avoid this double taxation, most small corporations elect to be taxed
as S corporations, where only the owners are taxed on corporate profits
(pass-through taxation). However, a corporation must meet strict criterion
to qualify for S corporate tax status and such requirements often constrict
the operation or financing of the business. An LLC, however, may be taxed
as a C corporation, S corporation or partnership if owned by multiple
taxpayers or as a disregarded entity if owned by only one taxpayer. Partnership
taxation is often seen as preferable to S or C corporate tax status, because
it avoids a C corporation's double taxation and the structural limitations
required of S corporations. Furthermore, unlike corporations, a return
of capital from the LLC to a partner/LLC member usually doesn't trigger
a tax and a distribution of profit need not be proportional to one's
ownership interest in the company. Nonetheless, if an LLC chooses to be
taxed as either a C or S corporation it may do so, while corporations,
in turn, may not choose to be taxed as a partnership or disregarded entity.
Despite the drawbacks of corporations, there are instances where a corporation
is preferred over an LLC. The main benefit of corporations is its stock
may be freely transferred without the consent of other shareholders or
corporate management. This is essential for any publicly traded company.
Companies that plan a public offering should be a corporation. Furthermore,
any company that wants easy transferability of ownership or that has a
complex equity structure should prefer the corporate form of organizations.
Finally, some businesses — such as banks, insurance companies or
public utilities — are required by law to be corporations. Most
other companies, however, would find it advantageous to be formed as an
LLC, a limited partnership (LP) or limited liability partnership (LLP).
An LLC is similar to an S corporation since the owners of both entities
enjoy limited liability and both entities can be taxed as a proprietorship
or partnership and thus enjoy the benefits of pass- through taxation.
An LLC member's risk, as with a corporation, is also limited to loss
of investment. However, a chief asset protection advantage of the LLC
over the S corporation is that the LLC affords you more protective ownership
options. For example, an LLC can be owned by a family limited partnership
(FLP), a trust, another corporation, and so forth. S corporation shares
cannot be owned by these entities. Their stock ownership is primarily
restricted to individuals. Both estate and asset protection planning become
more difficult with S corporation shares.
More importantly, an ownership interest in an LLC has considerably greater
creditor-protection than shares in an S corporation, which can be easily
seized by a stockholder's personal creditors. A member's interest
in an LLC is creditor protected in the same way a partner's interest
in a limited partnership is protected. A member's personal creditor
is limited only to a charging order against the LLC interest. This gives
the creditor only the right to receive distributed profits due the debtor partners.
Finally, because an LLC can choose to be taxed as an S corporation, it
can be argued that the S corporation will become obsolete as a business
entity. Corporations may only be suitable for companies that plan to go
public or have large, complex equity structures. Because an S corporation's
ownership is limited to 100 shareholders, it cannot go public. This will
limit it to a simple equity structure. Only in rare circumstance would
one form an S corporation instead of an LLC.
There are still several advantages of an S corporation over the LLC:
1) An S corporation can be more tax advantageously acquired by another business
2) S corporation owners pay employment taxes only on their salaries; LLC
owners pay employment taxes on all profits
3) State taxes are sometimes lower for an S corporation.
YES, YOU CAN LOSE EVERYTHING!
You may think that your wealth is safe and that you don't need protection.
But don't delude yourself and accept reality — for every 60
minutes you spend making money, spend 60 seconds thinking about how to
protect it!